ArrayArray

Highlights

  1. This article aims to bring together critical theories and relational theorizing to move from onto-epistemological to ethico-political aspects
  2. It provides an approach to the “boundary” problem in relationalist theorizing by suggesting to focus the analysis on the relations that matter
  3. The article argues for more plural grounds for relationalism in IR

Abstract

What relations matter? This question sits at the heart of this article and addresses in a more thoroughgoing way the methodological and ethico-political problems that some relational thinkers have debated. We are interested in deep relationalism and the methodological problem of delineating which relations matter in a reality defined by an ever-unfolding web of relations. By acknowledging the relationality of critical international relations (IR) theories, this methodological puzzle is explored by recognizing the situatedness of relations that are being analyzed. Moreover, this helps us to start a conversation on the ethical and political dimensions of deeply relational approaches. By placing the ontological work of deep relationalism in dialogue with the epistemological and ethico-political aspects of critical theory, we are putting forth an account of critical relationalism. Furthermore, we are not only arguing for a critical approach to relationalism but also adding to one of the main methodological debates in relationalism that asks us to carefully consider which relations matter (for our analysis) and how we should access them? Finally, this piece advocates for more plural grounds for relationalism in IR to critically reflect on which relations our theoretical approaches can take us to and why this matters.

 


International Studies Quarterly, Volume 67, Issue 1, March 2023
https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqad010